Guido Ivan Justo vs Tomas Farjat Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 03 Mar at 07:23 PM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

G. Ivan Justo vs T. Farjat

Guido Ivan Justo
Guido Ivan Justo

Flag ARG ARG

l
w
w
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
Tomas Farjat
Tomas Farjat

Flag ARG ARG

w
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
w
l

2

Win

6

Played

4

Win

27
Age
24
-
Height
-
369
C. Rank
875
344
Best Rank
447
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Justo 2 - 4 Farjat

They have played 13 sets in total, with Guido Ivan Justo winning 6 and Tomas Farjat winning 7. The last match between Guido Ivan Justo and Tomas Farjat was at the Cordoba Challenger, 03-03-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Guido Ivan Justo getting the victory 6-3 7-6(5).

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Justo2
Farjat4
Last 6 H2H Matches:

(Q3Cordoba Challenger(03-03-25)

Clay
ARG Flag
Guido Ivan Justo
6
7
ARG Flag
Tomas Farjat
3
6

(Q3Antofagasta Challenger(09-18-23)

Clay
ARG Flag
Tomas Farjat
6
7
ARG Flag
Guido Ivan Justo
2
5

(R1M15 Buenos Aires(08-29-23)

Clay
ARG Flag
Tomas Farjat
0
ARG Flag
Guido Ivan Justo
1

G. I. Justo vs T. Farjat H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
60.56% (215-140)Career Total W/L57.35% (199-148)
2Clay4
4Titles1
2Total H2H Matches4
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

G. I. Justo vs T. Farjat Match Preview:

Which player has the upper hand in terms of second serve efficiency over the past six months? Justo seems to have a slight edge, winning 42.21% of points off their second serve, a tad better than Farjat's 39.81%. This metric often indicates how well players handle crucial in-game situations, making it a reliable predictor of match outcomes.

How do they compare when it comes to returning their opponent’s second serve? Interestingly, Farjat edges out Justo here, capturing 47.37% compared to Justo's 46.4%. However, when faced with first serves, the tables turn dramatically. Justo dominates with 33% returns, vastly surpassing Farjat's 22.29%. These statistics paint a complex picture of their relative strengths and vulnerabilities on court.

Under pressure, which player buckles and who stands firm? When it comes to saving breakpoints, Farjat seems to hold the psychological upper hand with a 56.25% savings rate, compared to Justo's 50.65%. This ability to fend off breakpoints could indeed play a pivotal role in the final shake-up, especially when odds are tight and stakes are high.

Performance across various surfaces also adds layers to this predictive puzzle. Justo's forte appears on clay, boasting a 62% win rate, while indoors on hard surfaces, Farjat thrives with a 75% win rate. Understanding these surface preferences could be crucial, as these win rates often heavily influence a player's adaptability and game strategy.

Delving into their head-to-head history, in five encounters, Farjat has triumphed thrice, even clinching their most recent meeting at the Antofagasta Challenger. Interestingly, in matches that extend to deciding sets, Justo has shown resilience, winning 65% of such matches over the past year, a statistic vital for those contemplating live predictions and betting decisions.

Finally, both players converge in extreme pressure scenarios, with Justo having a slight edge in tiebreak situations, winning both they've contested against Farjat. Farjat, however, has faced slightly more formidable opponents, indicated by the average rank of 327.09 compared to Justo's 340.68. These nuances suggest a close match that could easily tilt either way, but with Justo's historically stronger first serve returns and tiebreak composure, they might just emerge victorious.

Analyzing breakpoints, both conversion and saving, along with opponent quality and past performances, all hint at a thrilling confrontation. While past records favor Farjat, Justo's strength under extreme pressure, particularly in tiebreaks and deciding sets, makes them a formidable contender in this impending matchup. Expect an exhilarating duel where Justo might just edge ahead.

Guido Ivan Justo vs Tomas Farjat Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

G. I. Justo vs T. Farjat H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
2H2H Matches Won3
6Sets Won7
57Games Won67
9Aces (Total)35
12Total Double Faults23
1:26:57Average Match Time1:26:57
67% (272/404)1st Serve %56% (216/389)
67% (183/272)1st Serve Win %71% (154/216)
53% (70/132)2nd Serve Win %52% (90/173)
38% (10/26)Break Pts Won %40% (17/43)
37% (145/389)Return Points Win %37% (151/404)
40% (2/5)Best‑of‑3 Win %60% (3/5)
50% (1/2)Deciding Set Win %50% (1/2)
75% (3/4)1st Set Won, Won Match100% (2/2)
25% (1/4)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/2)
0% (0/2)1st Set Lost, Won Match25% (1/4)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Justo 49%, Farjat 45%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Justo 55%, Farjat 52%.
Break Points Saved %: Justo 54%, Farjat 63%.

G. I. Justo Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayMontevideo Challenger - 10-11-2025

R1

PARA. Daniel
L
4-6 6-2 6-3

Q3

BOLM. Dellien
W
6-3 6-1

Q1

URUF. Aguilar
W
6-4 6-1
ClayLima 3 Challenger - 03-11-2025

Q3

BOLM. Dellien
L
7-5 1-6 6-3

Q1

PERR. Varillas
W
6-0 6-1

T. Farjat Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayM25 Zlatibor - 22-09-2025

R2

BIHN. Fatic
L
6-2 6-3

R1

BULG. Lazarov
W
6-2 6-2
ClayM15 Kursumlijska Banja - 15-09-2025

R1

BULD. Dinev
L
6-3 7-6(3)
ClayM15 Kursumlijska Banja - 08-09-2025

R2

ARGJ. Bautista
L
6-4 6-3

R1

SRBM. Miladinovic
W
6-4 6-0
banner

G. I. Justo vs T. Farjat Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
60.56% (215/140)YTD Win/Loss57.35% (199/148)
58.50% (475/337)Sets Win/Loss54.45% (434/363)
53.44% (3927/3422)Games Win/Loss51.34% (3894/3690)
48.15% (13/14)Hard Win/Loss61.54% (32/20)
61.85% (201/124)Clay Win/Loss56.36% (164/127)
33.33% (1/2)Indoor Hard W/L75.00% (3/1)
0.11Aces Per Game0.38
395Aces Total1403
0.2Double Faults Per Game0.21
707Total Double Faults790
1:29:53Average Match Time1:14:35
416.83Average Opponent Rank362.57
66% (13008/19747)1st Serve %57% (10859/19054)
63% (8147/13008)1st Serve Win %70% (7618/10859)
49% (3280/6738)2nd Serve Win %46% (3771/8195)
47% (1100/2364)Break Points Won % (Total)41% (727/1790)
44% (8859/20015)Return Points Win %39% (7245/18517)
0.00% (0/2)Main Tour W/L0% (0/0)
53.01% (44/39)Challenger W/L50.67% (38/37)
63.33% (171/99)Futures W/L59.19% (161/111)
61% (210/345)Best of 3 Sets Win %56% (190/338)
25% (1/4)Best of 5 Sets Win %100% (2/2)
60% (50/84)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)51% (50/99)
56% (59/105)Deciding Set Win %59% (64/108)
90% (199/179)1st Set Won, Won Match88% (173/153)
10% (199/19)1st Set Won, Lost Match11% (173/19)
22% (155/34)1st Set Lost, Won Match25% (174/44)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction
AUSJ. M. Kubler4
AUSL. Tu
W1
2.55
W2
1.44
07:05 PM 16/11/25
Prediction
ECUM. Maldonado
ARGN. G. Longo
W1
4.35
W2
1.166
07:00 PM 16/11/25
Prediction
PERA. H. D. Pino
ECUF. Wright
W1
1.002
W2
11.25
10:00 PM 16/11/25
Prediction
ECUF. J. R. Gallegos
BRAV. H. R. Pagotto
W1
3.56
W2
1.24
08:30 PM 16/11/25
Prediction
USAM. Clark
BRAE. C. Lima
W1
3.34
W2
1.27
04:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction
KORH. Chung
JPNK. Uchida8
W1
2.22
W2
1.571

Potential H2H Matches This Week

Justo (Florianopolis Challenger)
Justo vs TavernaCould play in The Quarterfinals
Justo vs SilvaCould play in The Quarterfinals
Justo vs TorresCould play in The Quarterfinals
Justo vs TobonCould play in The Quarterfinals
Kuzuhara vs JustoCould play in The Second
Silva vs JustoCould play in The Second

Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025

Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?

15 Nov 2025

Carlos Alcaraz vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 15th November 2025 Best Bets

15 Nov 2025

Rebecca Sramkova vs Simona Waltert Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 15th November 2025 Best Bets

15 Nov 2025

Maria Camila Osorio Serrano vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 15th November 2025 Best Bets

15 Nov 2025

Prediction Of Auger-Aliassime Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?

15 Nov 2025

Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?